0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹Çü ¼ºÀΠȯÀÚ ³«»óÀ§Çè »çÁ¤µµ±¸ °³¹ß

Development of Fall Assessment Scale in Adult Inpatients

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2019³â 25±Ç 2È£ p.179 ~ 188
KMID : 1004620190250020179
ÃÖÀºÈñ ( Choi Eun-Hee ) - Çѱ¹¼º¼­´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

°í¹Ì¼÷ ( Ko Mi-Suk ) - Çѱ¹¼º¼­´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
È«»óÈñ ( Hong Sang-Hee ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ¿ë»êº´¿ø
±èÀμ÷ ( Kim In-Sook ) - °­³²¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø

Abstract

Purpose: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Á¾ÇÕº´¿ø¿¡ ÀÔ¿øÇÑ Çѱ¹Çü ¼ºÀÎȯÀÚ ³«»óÀ§Çè »çÁ¤µµ±¸(Adult Fall Assessment Scale Korean version, FAS-K)¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Methods: ±¹³»¿Ü ¹®Çå°ú Àü¹®°¡ ÀÇ°ßÀ» Åä´ë·Î 14°³ ¹®Ç×ÀÇ ¼ºÀÎȯÀÚ ³«»óÀ§Çè »çÁ¤µµ±¸¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ¿´°í, Á¶»çÀÚ°£ ½Å·Úµµ °ËÁõÀº Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù., ÁØ°ÅŸ´çµµ´Â MFS°ú JHFRAT¸¦ ÁØ°Å·Î ÇÏ¿© FAS-K¿ÍÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ Pearson¡¯s correlation coefficient, º¯º°Å¸´çµµ´Â ³«»ó¹ß»ý ¿©ºÎ¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦ Mann-Whitney °ËÁ¤À¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Results: Á¶»çÀÚ °£ ICC °ªÀº .958À̾ú°í, CVI´Â .70¢¦1.00À̾ú´Ù. FAS-K¿Í MFSÀÇ »ó°ü°è¼ö °ªÀº .74(p<.001), FAS-K¿Í JHFRATÀÇ »ó°ü°è¼ö °ªÀº .87(p<.001)·Î ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÑ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ³«»ó±º°ú ºñ³«»ó±ºÀ» ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú FAS-K (Z=-3.10, p=.002)¿Í MFS (Z=-3.23, p=.001)¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

Conclusion: °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î FAS-K°¡ Ÿ´çµµ°¡ ³ôÀº ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â µµ±¸ÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a valid Adult Fall Assessment Scale Korean version(FAS-K) for inpatients in general hospitals in Korea.

Methods: This a 14 item FAS-K was developed based on a review of national and international research and expert opinions in related field. Interrater reliability of FAS-K was analyzed using the ICC(Intraclass Correlation Coefficients). To examine the validity of FAS-K, a CVI(Content Validity Index), the Pearson correlation coefficients between FAS-K and two widely used scales, the Morse Fall Scale(MFS) and the Johns Hopkins Hospital Fall Risk Assessment Tool(JHFRAT), and the Mann-Whitney test were used.

Results: The ICC was .958. The CVI ranged from .70 to 1.00. The FAS-K was significantly associated with the MFS(r=.74, p<.001) and with the JHFRAT(r=.87, p<.001), verifying the concurrent validity of FAS-K. As for the construct validity of FAS-K, significant differences between the fall and non-fall groups were found not only in the MFS(Z=-3.23, p=.001) but also in the FAS-K(Z=-3.10, p=.002).

Conclusion: The findings indicate that the FAS-K is a reliable fall risk assessment tool with high validity.
KeyWords
³«»ó, À§Çè»çÁ¤, Ÿ´çµµ, ÀÔ¿ø ȯÀÚ
Falls, Risk Assessment, Validation, Inpatients
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)